| back to
mcqs.com
We Need Contributors to work from home by email.
MCQS.com is looking for talented writers
and quality material to add to the content on this site.
Contributions must be of high standard
Please look at this example
Please also look at our guidelines
MCQS.com is managed by MCQS Limited
, a limited liability company registered in Malta in 1995, Registration Number C 14681 , PE number 755531
The registered address of the company is 19, Main Street, St Julians, Malta, Europe 24-hour telephone helpline is available on +356-21339834
Procedure
Apply to join the team at MCQS.com by
sending an email to info@mcqs.com
Payment is of 10 euros (about 8 UK pounds, or 12 dollars) for every accepted question. Please note that we don't issue payment to questions that are not suitable for publication. In addition we do not provide feedback on questions that are not accepted for publication. Please look at the following example as an illustration of an acceptable standard, note that the explanation must be clear and must be relevant to the question asked.
An example of an acceptable
question and explanation;
An 84-year-old woman complained of dark brown urine. Her medical history was significant for hypertension, congestive heart failure, and supraventricular tachycardia. The arrhythmia had been treated with amiodarone. She was also on diuretics, nifedipine and aspirin. She had no history of alcohol abuse. Her bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase level and alkaline phosphatase levels were markedly elevated. Her serum levels of amiodarone was within the normal reference range. Prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time were normal. Urinalysis was positive for bilirubin and urobilinogen. Viral hepatitis A, B, C markers and antimitochondrial and antinuclear antibodies were all negative.
She was suspected to have obstruction of the biliary tree but endoscopic retrograde cholangiography revealed cholelithiasis, and an ultrasound of the liver showed evidence of non-alcoholic steatosis.
Her bilirubin increased further and it wa decided to perform a liver biopsy. The liver biopsy revealed portal fibrosis but no evidence of cirrhosis. The hepatocytes showed intense ballooning degeneration and abundant Mallory bodies.
Hepatocytes from the liver biopsy core were then examined by an electron microscope. What most relevant finding would you expect in the cytoplasm of these hepatocytes?
|
a) Polar bodies
b) Dohle's bodies
c) Hematoxylin bodies
d) Lamellar bodies
e) Negri bodies
|
| Explanation
The answer should be Lamellar bodies
The history and histology should have pointed you towards amiodarone-induced hepatotoxicity. You should then be aware that a characteristic feature of amiodarone-induced hepatotoxicity on electron microscopy is the finding of lamellar bodies. If you were unaware of this fact, you could also have come to the correct answer by elimination of the other choices.
The histomorphologic findings of the liver biopsy were consistent with amiodarone-induced cholestatic hepatotoxicity. Therefore you should expect the electron microscopic examination to confirm this diagnosis.The single feature that is virtually diagnostic of amiodarone-induced hepatotoxicity on electron microscopic examination are cytoplasmic lysosomal lameller inclusions .
Although we cannot completely exclude the possibility of liver damage secondary to medications other than amiodarone in this patient, the histologic findings and clinical course are against this possibility. The patient was taking multiple cardiac and hypertensive medications prior to and after the onset of her liver injury, including calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and aspirin. Calcium channel blockers as a class have been associated with hepatocellular and cholestatic injury, presumably through a hypersensitivity mechanism. However, in the reported cases with nifedipine-induced liver injury, only 1 of 10 cases had Mallory bodies present in the liver biopsy specimen.
Lysosomal lamellar bodies occur almost uniformly in any patient taking amiodarone, even in the absence of overt liver damage, and therefore are not confirmatory of amiodarone toxicity. In our case, however, the histologic changes of cholestatic hepatitis with alcohol-like hepatocellular injury in the presence of lysosomal lamellar inclusions is consistent with amiodarone toxicity as the major cause of this patient’s jaundice. Other causes of cholestasis, such as viral hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, and extrahepatic biliary obstruction, were ruled out by the serologic and imaging studies. The presence of bile ducts excluded the possibility of idiopathic adult ductopenia. There was also no history of alcohol abuse, which may cause a similar histologic picture. In the presence of cholelithiasis, the possibility of transient gallstones in the common bile duct causing obstruction cannot be entirely excluded, but endoscopic retrograde cholangiography did not demonstrate obstruction, and the imaging studies (abdominal ultrasound and dimethyl iminodiacetic acid scan) performed at the peak of the jaundice were again negative.
What are the histological features of amiodarone-induced hepatotoxicity ?
Histology is likely to show lobular architecture distorted by moderate portal fibrosis and moderate pericellular sinusoidal fibrosis in zone 1 of the Rappaport acinus and focally irregular lobular sinusoidal fibrosis. No bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis is evident. The expanded portal tracts show moderate to severe ductular proliferation and a mild lymphocytic infiltrate with rare polymorphonuclear leukocytes. There is no cholangitis. The hepatocytes show intense ballooning degeneration and abundant Mallory bodies. Hepatocellular necrosis with neutrophil satellitosis are also present. Anisonucleosis, prominent binucleation, and glycogenated nuclei are present. Bile stasis has no zonal distribution and is canalicular and cytoplasmic often in areas of ballooned, degenerated liver Periodic acid–Schiff stain after diastase digestion shows abundant sinusoidal lining cells and macrophages with periodic acid–Schiff–positive ceroid-lipofuscin cytoplasmic pigment
electron microscopic examination
The diagnosis of amiodarone-induced hepatotoxicity is further supported by transmission electron microscopic examination, which revealed a variable number of cytoplasmic lysosomal lameller inclusions , compatible with secondary amiodarone-induced phospholipidosis. Such inclusions may be noted in hepatocytes, bile duct epithelium, Kupffer cells, and macrophages. Additionally, the hepatocytes contain aggregates of paranuclear haphazardly arranged intermediate cytoplasmic filaments consistent with Mallory bodies. Small lipid droplets are noted in some hepatocytes. Abundant pericanalicular autophagic vacuoles and secondary lysosomes with a granular matrix reflecting bile stasis were present. Few canaliculi show dilatation with condensed pericanalicular filaments, distorted, focally flattened microvilli, and electron-dense granular luminal contents presumed to be bile. Degenerated hepatocytes, portal fibrosis, and portal neutrophils and lymphocytes are also noted.
History
Cholestasis has been reported as a rare presentation among patients with amiodarone hepatotoxicity. There are reports of patients who presented with jaundice as the major clinical manifestation of amiodarone hepatotoxicity. Cholestasis appears to occur in older patients . The presence of increased serum bilirubin level indicated a poor prognosis even with the relatively unremarkable serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels. Histopathologic findings of hepatic fibrosis and necrosis correlates highly with poor prognosis. Besides prognostic significance, histopathologic examination of a liver biopsy specimen is of value in rendering the diagnosis of amiodarone-induced cholestatic liver injury. Steatosis, both macrovesicular and microvesicular, was the most frequent histopathologic change. Ballooning of hepatocytes, Mallory bodies, and fibrosis were also common. Characteristic lamellar lysosomal inclusion bodies representing phospholipidosis are usually found ultrastructurally.
Lamellar bodies
Lamellar bodies are ctoplasmic inclusion bodies that contain lipids to be secreted. In alveolar epithelial cells lamellar bodies are specialized for the storage of surfactant phospholipids. Secretion of lung surfactant occurs via exocytosis of lamellar bodies in alveolar epithelial cells and is one of the most important aspects in lung surfactant homeostasis.
Other types of intracytoplasmic bodies
Döhle's bodies, Döhle's inclusion bodies, round to oval blue-staining inclusions seen in the periphery of the cytoplasm of neutrophils, consisting mainly of RNA derived from rough endoplasmic reticulum; they are found in association with many infections, burns, aplastic anemia, uncomplicated pregnancy, and after administration of toxic agents. Similar structures, usually larger and more prominent, are present in granulocytes other than neutrophils in the May-Hegglin anomaly. Called also Amato b's and leukocyte inclusions.
Hematoxylin body, a dense, homogeneous, cyanophilous particle consisting of the denatured nuclear material of an injured cell together with a small amount of cytoplasm, occurring in systemic lupus erythematosus; lymphocytes that ingest such particles are known as LE cells. Called also LE b.
Negri bodies, oval or round inclusion bodies, seen in the cytoplasm and sometimes in the processes of nerve cells of rabid animals or patients with rabies after death; their presence is considered conclusive proof of rabies.
Polar bodies, 1. the small nonfunctional cells with a haploid chromosome complement, consisting of a small amount of cytoplasm and a nucleus, resulting from unequal division of the primary oocyte (first polar b.) and, if fertilization occurs, of the secondary oocyte (second polar b.); the polar body appears as a speck at the animal pole of the egg. 2. metachromatic granules located at one or both ends of a bacterial cell.
|
Note that questions must be unambigious. The options should be clear. The
explanation should be completely relevant to the question. No extra information
should be given. The explanation should be absolutely relevant to the question asked, and options available, and should fully explain the answer including why other choices of options are incorrect. No spelling mistakes are tolerated. Any
abbreviations should be fully explained and any values should include the
'normal' range in brackets next to the value given.
Guidelines for Contributions
to MCQS.com- a summary
Acceptable questions MUST have ;
1. correct english and terminology
2. Only one variable in the stem question or statement
3. Extensive relevant explanations
4. No ambiguity or controversy
5. No 'may,always,' or other subjective terms
6. Originality - copied or scanned questions from
books are not acceptable
7. The options (the five possible answers) should be generally restricted to one word (and very rarely to more than three words)
8. The question should be descriptive and clear (including when
appropriate a few distractors)
9. The explanation should entirely relevant to the question asked and
should contain no extra information not questioned
10. The right answer should
be given first with an explanation and then the wrong answers should be
given with an explanation as to why they are wrong.
11. Teaching points should
be stressed, repeatedly if necessary, in clear , easy readable grammar, if
possible frequently interrupted by full-stops.
12. There should be five options (a to e) in each question.
We know its a tough job, that's
why we're paying out a lot of money for quality questions and explanations.
Please do not take offence if your questions are not
accepted. Our students are VERY demanding and will want detailed
and relevant explanations for each question. Any contributions not following the above directives
are rejected without asessment, though in some cases we may send comments and allow for small
corrections and resubmission.
|